Taking your last question first, no. We found so many flaws in the approach taken in that study that we would certainly not want to replicate it.
That study was one of four put out by the CAW last year. Basically it just reissued that study. It was the worst-case scenario of the four and provided a provincial breakdown. This was the same study we had seen a year before; the same methodology problems we had with it then still pertained, and I went through those. It's not grounded in any analysis of Canada-Korea trade. It doesn't allow for the fact that Canada trades with anybody else. You yourself mentioned the 12,000 jobs lost in the computer and electronics sector, in which there currently aren't tariffs between Canada and Korea; how would an FTA bring about 12,000 jobs lost in that sector?