Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think Mr. Holder will take the second part of this question.
I think the whole COOL regulatory regime we've struggled with as government. We certainly recognize that Canadian industry has done a pretty good job of abiding by the regulatory regime. I think you're being kind to your American counterparts. I think you're being very kind to them, quite frankly.
I want to comment on what you said at the end of the discussion, because this is really my point. I think it really does promote our system. I had a small flock of sheep before politics, and I also had some background in the forest industry, where we watch our product management very closely and have been watching since the eighties with country-of-origin regulations. I'd just like to explain something on that.
You talked about zoning systems. Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, P.E.I., and Newfoundland have a zoning system for forestry that is separate from that for the rest of the country. We have a 72% private land base, and we work on the same basis as the Americans do. We proved that during “shakes and shingles” in the eighties and brought in a regulatory regime then to show that all of our lumber comes from Atlantic woodlands. In the last softwood lumber discussion, we were exempt from that. We couldn't get exempt from anti-dumping, but we certainly were exempt from countervail.