I think we have to look at reality. We've had two sovereign nations, Peru and Canada, negotiate a free trade agreement between the two countries in good faith. We also have to look at the reality that we're not the United States of America, that we're roughly one-tenth the size. We don't have the same clout.
The agreement, certainly as I've read it and I've heard our trade officials talk about it, I think is pretty good agreement. But we also have to look at the Peruvians themselves. The people of Peru had a government that ran on a free trade platform, they were elected on a free trade platform, and they negotiated a free trade agreement in good faith. I'm a bit astounded when I hear some of our members say they don't have the right to do that, that somehow they're not sufficiently advanced in the democratic process to do that. I think it's a bit disingenuous on our part to say that. There are good environmental aspects to this agreement, there's good corporate social responsibility. The whole idea of non-discriminatory law allows people to negotiate in good faith and have a dispute mechanism. To me it makes a lot of sense.
That's more of a statement than anything else, and I know Dean has a real question.