I think essentially what you're saying is that the type of indirect expropriation—loss of profits and loss of investment that we've seen with the Ethyl Corporation, without chemicals—would be permitted through this agreement. I did want to ask why the definitions were included in the annex as opposed to in article 812, because in article 812 it's very specific around indirect expropriation, but there is none of the refining of definitions that was referred to in the presentation.
Why in the annex rather than the article of the treaty itself?