There's an expression in French--I don't know if you have the same in English--Ce n'est pas le Pérou; it's not Peru. That's very true of that deal, but overall it's positive. It's little, but it's positive.
I was not that clear on the second-last comment, that if another country negotiates something with Peru in the future, there's a clause in the agreement that the U.S. will obtain the same consideration. Canada was not able to put the same clause in our agreement. So if, for example, Europe obtained something better with Peru than what the U.S. has, the U.S. will have it. If Europe negotiates something better with Peru than what Canada has, Canada will not have it. We didn't include that part in the deal. That's also something that embarrasses us a little.
That's why, if you understand the overall picture, there is a risk in the next couple of years, up to 10 years, that some of the market we already have in Peru will be taken by somebody else, especially the U.S. There is a risk. So there is probably a need for a very close follow-up of the numbers for what Canada is trading with Peru, and back and forth.