As to the U.S. relationship, it's not a debate about the benefits of NAFTA. When we got into the free trade agreement with the U.S. we were going to end the harassment of our softwood lumber industry. Let me go back a bit in history. We're still dealing with the softwood lumber industry today, but we've evolved. Our trade with the U.S. has grown, but I would argue that our trade with the U.S. would have grown anyway. It's a natural evolution of our relationship and our integrated market.
There are things that I think we need to pursue, because they have a broader interest. But in regard to the concerns we've been raising, there has been little reflection on how the government approaches the policy mechanism. It's the same standard, or some variation of it. Nothing has really changed. We're not suggesting that we shouldn't have a good trading relationship with the European Union, similar to the one we have with the United States, Mexico, and other countries. We just think that a mechanism for dealing with the concern we're raising needs to be addressed in an adequate manner.