I appreciate that.
This is more hypothetical, Mr. Feldman.
I'm not trying to say that NAFTA is perfect. I don't think any of us believe that. I don't know if there are any trading agreements that are perfect. But the difficulty is that without it we don't have rules-based trading. If you look at the black liquor issue, what do you see under the existing agreement? Whether it's a chapter 11 challenge or a countervailing tariff because we claim damage against the Americans, it still doesn't do anything in the short term. These are notoriously long-term, and your graph shows that the terms are getting longer.
Do you see a legitimate Canadian challenge there or a countervailing duty?