Thank you for your question. I believe everyone here has partly answered it.
First of all, from our perspective, I think, the supply management is not on the table. Instructions from us, from our political level and from a bureaucratic level, are very, very clear. Supply management is something that we, as Canadians and as trade officials, hold dear. We're not discussing that one.
On the WTO, you are correct: that is a preferred means for trade liberalization. We have put all of our focus on the WTO, but when you look at many of our competitors over the last few years, you see that they have signed a number of bilateral or regional agreements. In fact, we're now at a stage of being behind the competition in some ways, so we are in a very aggressive mode on bilateral agreements. It's not just FTAs. It's foreign investment protection, air services, or whatever tool will make the difference in a particular market. In some markets, it might be an FTA. In some, it might be science and technology agreements. In some, it might be air negotiations.
The difference now is that instead of doing a broad brush across the world, we're trying to ask what it is we need to do in Panama or in Mexico or in the EFTA countries and then pick the tool. That might be the best way of replying to that. I'm not sure.
David?