It's an interesting question. The AFL-CIO has been in fairly detailed discussions with the Democratic Party about what labour provisions would be acceptable to the AFL-CIO. For a variety of political reasons, the AFL-CIO was ultimately not able to endorse the U.S.-Peru agreement, but it did agree on model language, I believe. Certainly when the Democrats were in opposition they agreed on a model language, which the AFL-CIO endorsed, on the labour protections that should be found in trade agreements. That model language is substantially better than what's in the Canada-Peru FTA, and it's obviously much better than what's in the existing NAFTA.
My point is that in the United States at least, for whatever reason, the Democratic Party has historically been engaged with the labour movement on these issues in a manner that, without getting into the minutiae of Canadian politics, has simply not happened in Canada. I think that's important to note. I don't know if that's of assistance to you.