Sure.
As I understand it, line 20 and 21 are in subclause 8(1). This wouldn't substantively change the agreement. It's not clear what precisely the purpose of the amendment would be, only that it would put an additional obligation on the Attorney General of Canada, if he or she were to consent to the cause of action of the sort described in subclause (1), to explain in writing why he or she was consenting. That's what it would do.