I can't answer you with regard to the 2002 document because that was a Liberal government document.
As Mr. Keddy said, our position is very clear. We agree on the very clear, very firm direction the Parliament of Canada took in 2005: we have to protect our supply management system. That's our position, and we're going to continue to maintain it.
One of the difficulties now lies in the fact that the process is ongoing. As you know, negotiations are now underway and may perhaps last another year or two, but I hope it won't be that long. That's why it's hard to make a comment every time, on every position, because it's the final position that's very important. And that's why I agree with you, sir.
Our position on our supply management system is very clear, and we're going to maintain it. We've received comments, to the effect that there might be a 23% reduction, which is unacceptable. There was another suggestion: the percentage of tariff lines that we can protect should be neither more nor less than 4%, but that's not our position. In our view, it should stay at 6%. And there's no reduction with regard to the 23%.
Sometimes we have suggestions, positions and possibilities, and you're right to ask questions. However, I can assure you that we are in a process, but we are going to maintain our position very firmly.