I'll take a bit of issue with you on Mr. Stephenson's remarks, because I did review them, and in my view, he could not have been clearer. When he was asked the question, will there be a diminution, a dilution, or some kind of moving away from protection of the supply-managed area, it was a one word answer: no. I think he has learned what we in politics could probably also learn: just make your answer very straightforward and then you won't get into other stuff. He was very clear about saying no. His history is very clear in defending that point.
I appreciate your suspicion about strong commitments, because maybe you had to deal with the former government. I don't know where you're getting your paranoia. But all I can say is that we are very clear on this.