Yes, I think they are. The most important thing, I think, is that other groups present different information. I think we should agree on how we present the data. I'm not saying that I have the last word on this. I'm just saying that if we're going to try to look at the evolution over time of something--call it unemployment, call it inflation, call it growth, call it violence against union members, call it violence against the police, call it whatever--we should agree on how we look at information and how much we manipulate it.
I don't want to say that academic economists have the truth in their hands, but this is the way we handle information, taking yearly figures and looking at the evolution over time of those yearly figures or monthly figures or trimester figures or something clearly defined.
Let me refer to a piece of information that I said they always bring, the total number of killings of union members under the Uribe administration. Why is it only under the Uribe administration? If they want to increase the number, why don't they add figures going back to 1986? If what they want is to bring up a huge number, then they should add everything they can, right? I think we should be very clear and very serious about how we handle information, especially if this information is going to be used to block an economic reform that is very important for Colombia.