I will make a point of reading it. In your last comments, you used the word “potential”--so once again, supposition and not clear.
Could I ask you a separate question? We have different perspectives, but I think this is fair. Most of our guests to date--in fact, all of them, I would say--support trade. They may not support a free trade agreement, per se, but they support trade. And I thought I heard some reference to that. Quite honestly, we do trade today. We do significant trade. What we're trying to do is draw the barriers down to the advantage of Canada and Colombia alike.
They also, to a person, said that they saw a need for an enforceable rules-based system. The absence of rules, as I believe Mr. Keddy was trying to suggest, ultimately leads to less fairness and potentially more chaos.
Maybe I could flip the question around. What do you see as the positive, or the upside, of increased trade with Colombia?