I'm not in disagreement with you at all. We're not in disagreement that there should be rules in place. We're active elsewhere promoting rules around investment, human rights protection, environmental protection, and corporate and social responsibility attached to investment and trade—absolutely.
I think the point we've tried to make clearly here is that we're not attributing any specific failure of due diligence or good intentions on the part of the investors. There may or may not be. We weren't able to uncover evidence that would let us say somebody was acting badly on purpose. As I said before, if we had found that evidence, we absolutely would have brought it forward.
The reason it's particularly germane in the case of Colombia is because of the history of conflict, the layers of uncertainty, so that a company exercising what would be a normal level of due diligence, in the Colombian context, could still find itself implicated in these abuses. And that is precisely the danger we want to identify.