Thank you. That is a point of order. Let me first deal with your point of order and your recollection of events as they were concluded on Tuesday last.
I think it's important to note that it was very late in the day. It was 11 o'clock. The meeting time had come to an end. The meeting is to conclude at 11 o'clock, particularly with the circumstance that another committee is scheduled to be in this room, where we have the meeting, at 11 o'clock. That's well known to members. We allotted time at the end of the meeting, at the will of the committee, to deal with this motion, this matter. That was not a surprise to anyone. It should not have been a surprise to anyone. People knew we had to conclude by 11 o'clock. In fact, we had given people an opportunity to speak briefly on the motion. I think there was a clear sense—as chair, I got a clear sense—of, in your words, the will of the committee. The will of the committee was to pass this motion. We had representatives of the majority of the committee speak to the motion, in favour of the motion. We then entered what appeared to be a filibuster by Mr. Julian, just delaying, and the will of the committee was to pass the motion.
The chair then made the judgment to proceed. We had a point of order from Mr. Cannis, at which time the question was called. As chair, I recognized the question. We called the question. We had a vote. The vote was passed. The matter was dealt with, and we won't go back to that matter.
You can't challenge the chair after the vote has been cast on that matter. A matter once dealt with has been dealt with, and we won't be going back to it. So that would conclude that point of order.