Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I think very clearly we would want to see the City of Montreal and Équiterre here. I think they would be taking discussions that are focused on the trade element and the decision by the City of Montreal to support the pesticide ban.
I agree with Mr. Keddy and Mr. Brison that we're focusing on chapter 11 and not on the advisability or not of a pesticide ban. The democratic decision I think is the one that's impacted here.
Mr. Brison's case is quite compelling around Newfoundland and Labrador, but I would suggest that perhaps we'll be looking at more than two hours if we want to bring in all these elements. I think the Newfoundland and Labrador case on its own is a quite compelling one. We can look at extended hours, perhaps a three-hour meeting, if we wanted to work both in or over two meetings.
I think we all agree with the principle of dealing with chapter 11 and agree on having witnesses who address the chapter 11 provisions specifically. I'm flexible on some of the witnesses, but not on all of them. I think a couple definitely need to be here.