It is true that we have to prioritize what the House refers to us, and I think a number of parties around this table have flagged that Canada-Jordan would be a more effective use of parliamentary time if the objective of the government is to get a bill here to committee. Canada-Jordan would not require the same degree of debate in the House that other trade bills may. So assuming that, we could be discussing Canada-Jordan fairly shortly too.
Mr. Cannis mentioned Europe. He's very right on that: it is going to have to be on the radar screen. As for whether that's in the spring or the fall session, I guess it will be up to how quickly or slowly the negotiations progress.
Finally, I want to reiterate Mr. Brison's comment around China. I think it is certainly an important trade market that we have not discussed as a committee, certainly not in a long, long time and certainly not in any depth. So if it's something he is proposing as part of a longer-term study of a new and emerging market this year, I certainly would agree and I would support that.