That is accepted as a friendly and constructive amendment. We don't have to debate that amendment acceptance. That forms part of the motion. We are now discussing a motion that reads:
That the Committee hold hearings regarding the Canada-United States Agreement on Government Procurement, signed by the Canadian Government with the Obama Administration, and which came into force on February 16, 2010, and its impact on Canadian communities, businesses, and employment, and that the Committee invite the Minister of Trade to appear in this regard.
Does that sound pretty good?
Debate continues. I don't have anybody on the list of speakers. Are there any comments?