I have two comments.
One, I think it's important that we hear from reasonably balanced groupings of those people who are opposed and those in favour. What I have found in previous testimony is that those in favour typically make fairly similar cases and those opposed make similar cases. To the extent that we identify those who can best synthesize those arguments, I think that is very effective, particularly given the number of witnesses we've heard.
Secondly, I want to commend you, or the clerk, or whoever made the decision, for having a balance of both at committee. Sometimes at committee we've had one day where it is all one side, and then another day you have all of another side. I think it's nice to have a balanced approach, such that we can.
I think today, members, the degree to which we can have dialogue, discussion, and, to whatever extent, a little debate between members on specific points, I certainly would appreciate, and I think that would inform all our decisions.
Thank you.