Mr. Rowlinson, on human rights impact assessment, doing a human rights impact assessment of an agreement that does not yet exist is actually extremely difficult. To try to predict what the effect of an agreement that is notional, that hasn't been ratified yet, would be on human rights is very difficult. However, doing an annual impact assessment....
In fact, I won't go through the entire written agreement, but will go back to the testimony, before the committee, of Minister Plata. He read into the record what procedure would be required on an annual basis, where both the Colombian and Canadian governments would be responsible for the writings of reports that would be submitted to both parliaments and subject to scrutiny by civil society at committees like this. Having an annual vehicle through which to evaluate the human rights impact assessment of an actual--not a notional--agreement will provide this Parliament and civil society organizations an opportunity to continue the dialogue on human rights, to evaluate clearly the impact of human rights over the long term.
I would gladly meet with you. You said this is window dressing, but we've never met and we've never had an opportunity to go through, in a granular way, the full details of the agreement, but I would gladly do that. I would gladly meet with you anytime. I know it's difficult in terms of the committee because we don't have a lot of time to go through all of these. But I think all members of this committee want to see the advancement and strengthening of human rights in Colombia. The only reason we're talking about Colombian human rights at this committee is because there's a free trade agreement on the table that is bringing this discussion forward, which in fact helps demonstrate that economic engagement can help fortify human rights engagement. But our goal is to ensure, on an ongoing basis, that this continues to be the case, that the human rights discussion doesn't stop once the agreement is signed.
You said, “What happens if human rights worsen?” There's a six-month cancellation clause on this agreement that can be invoked by the Canadian government. On an annual basis, if we find human rights are worsening, and if that is the result of this FTA, that is the kind of scrutiny that Parliament is willing to be subjected to. The cancellation of an FTA is a very significant measure, but it's one that we have at our disposal as part of this agreement.