Just before I turn to Mr. Lemelin, I would just like to wrap up with you by saying that, although you care very much about those types of things, you did not mention them in your presentation. I find that a little unbalanced.
Mr. Lemelin, I liked your presentation very much, like Mr. Rowlinson's, even though the chair told you that you had exceeded your time. In my view, it is important for us to hear from all sides and to take the time necessary to understand things completely.
Since the hearings on this matter began, witnesses have taken a wide variety of positions. Last week, we even had a trade unionist from Colombia come here to tell us that it is all sweetness and light for union members in Colombia. But after hearing your presentation, Mr. Lemelin, we realize that free collective bargaining, as you said, does not exist. So they came up with a trade unionist who was hand in glove with the government, and was here with the Colombian minister of international trade to boot.
I am going to end my comments by asking you one final question. Do you think that Mr. Brison's position could be effective? He wants a report on the human rights situation a year after the treaty goes into effect.