I think the question I would focus on would be the narrow one. The human rights impact assessment process is trying to assess what the actual impacts of the agreement will be. The important thing is that you don't take an ideological position, and the impact assessment process should not take an ideological position on isolationism or integrationism. It should stand above that, and only then will it have the kind of credibility with all actors to be a process that can tell people what the actual impacts are.
On May 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.