As I've been saying, I think I'm probably the least qualified person to answer a specific question, because I don't claim to have any knowledge of Colombia and Canada.
The point I am strongly making to the committee is about assessing the rules. One doesn't bring in any rules willy-nilly. The rules of any kind of game can be beneficial or they can have negative impacts. The important thing is that you assess those rules.
A human rights framework gives you the ability to assess those rules, for instance, on the impacts on small farmers. I don't think there is this big dichotomy between the economic issues, as you put it, and the human rights issues. In fact we can use the human rights lens to give us a useful medium through which to view what the impacts.... For instance, we talked a lot today about what the impacts of free trade deals on small subsistence farmers in Colombia might be. The important thing for me is scrutiny of the rules. To me, that is what the human rights framework does.