Thank you very much for your question.
Again, what we need to be careful about is what we're talking about with the human rights impact assessment, the process of analyzing the human rights implications of the agreement itself. So yes, you may have all kinds of disagreements about the overall behaviour in Colombia on human rights terms, and there is far more expertise out there than I have on that.
But in terms of the process, when you hear the kinds of disagreements that I am hearing now between people talking, for instance, about the issue of food and the issue of how the free trade agreement will impact on subsistence farmers in Colombia, the idea is that by undertaking concrete, empirical research, which is human-rights-focused, on these kinds of issues--as I said, in preference in advance of the agreement being signed but as a second option, what we call an ex post assessment--you will cut through that ideological discussion. And instead, you may bring people together on the minutia of what's happening in the country. So the idea would be that it would then become a source of empirical data, which will feed into these arguments.
Who conducts the assessment is the second part of your question. There are independent experts doing this kind of work globally. I've just been invited to get involved in work like that in the Pacific, and I saw the other experts who were invited to tender for that work. That told me how many experts there are globally working on human rights and trade issues. So if you have to reach outside Canada and Colombia for expertise on this issue, that is perfectly possible, I think.