I appreciate that.
I would challenge the phrase “willy-nilly rules”. Perhaps that's a British expression--I don't know it--but it doesn't sound very formal. I think what we have here is a formal rules-based system, which in terms of labour conventions and in terms of environmental assessment and conditions is considered very strong. I think the details are quite precise.
There is a Canadian expression, and perhaps you know it: the devil is in the details. My Cape Breton mother made that up, and she would say you can't define anything until you know precisely the things you're dealing with.
I think this is as comprehensive an arrangement, perhaps with flaws.... But if you're going to assess it, wouldn't the opportunity to give it a chance be there?
You started, Mr. Harrison, and perhaps you could finish off that thought. Does it not make sense to give it a chance?