Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all witnesses for coming forward today.
I'm going to move along fairly quickly, and I'll start with you, Dr. Harrison. You're quite right to be worried about the phantom amendment, the amendment that never gets tabled, that basically forces the Colombian government to do what it already does, which is whitewash human rights violations on an annual basis.
You may be interested to know that we had the Colombian government and the Canadian government before this committee and they said exactly the same things about human rights, that the situation was marvellous, really, and when looking at the details such as the DAS scandal, they simply did not talk about the bulk of the concerns around human rights: African Colombians, forced displacement. None of that ever appeared.
So the issue around whether compelling the Colombian government to do what it already does—whitewash human rights by publishing an annual report—is in any way credible is a very good question. Many of our witnesses, when they've commented on it, have said it lacks credibility. But you've spelled out a very clear blueprint about what would actually constitute a human rights impact analysis. So knowing what you know now, that the Colombian government reports on itself, does it need in any way the blueprint that you've set out?