Yes, I am just trying to explain. In his arguments, Mr. Julian talked about tyranny and, in my opinion, that is exactly what we were seeing. You do not consider it to be a point of order, Mr. Chairman, but I say that what Mr. Julian is doing is demonstrating, relying on precedents, that there are very clear situations where Committee chairs or the Speaker of the House have made ruling that are completely contrary to the spirit of your rulings today.
So, that is the reason why I am speaking to this issue. The point of order I am making now is in support of what Mr. Julian was saying. In my view, he should continue to explain the precedents, because they are extremely relevant and clearly show that others have an opinion which is exactly the opposite of your own.