I still find this odd. I go back to the example of a related agreement, which I cited earlier, that was not included when this bill was drafted. You have answered me, but your answer does not entirely satisfy me. The major issue is whether there will be others, whether other related agreements will be negotiated later with Colombia dealing with something that is not included here. The government could then sign an agreement that would conflict with certain aspects of this legislation. Clause 5 means that the government could ultimately conclude a related agreement which would create a conflict between this legislation and the agreement.
I may be wrong, but this provision doesn't satisfy me.