Challenge the chair.
Evidence of meeting #20 for International Trade in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clause.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #20 for International Trade in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was clause.
A recording is available from Parliament.
9:40 p.m.
An hon. member
Challenge the chair.
9:40 p.m.
An hon. member
Are you challenging the chair?
9:45 p.m.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC
No. I'm asking you to ask the clerks. I'm asking directly. I am directing--
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
The Acting Chair Conservative Larry Miller
If I need to ask the clerks something, they're right here, I know. They're very close by, Mr. Julian.
9:45 p.m.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC
Mr. Chairman, you already have the...[Inaudible--Editor].
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
9:45 p.m.
NDP
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
The Acting Chair Conservative Larry Miller
That's right, and you respect them, too. You either call to overrule me--
9:45 p.m.
NDP
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
9:45 p.m.
NDP
Peter Julian NDP Burnaby—New Westminster, BC
I've asked you to ask the clerks. The clerks are here for all of us.
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
The Acting Chair Conservative Larry Miller
If I need advice or a resource I know where to find it, Mr. Julian, and it sure as hell won't be you.
9:45 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS
Mr. Chair, I really hate it when you two fight. I just wish you would get along.
9:45 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
9:45 p.m.
Conservative
The Acting Chair Conservative Larry Miller
Thank you.
We are now on to the next amendment if you care to go ahead with your amendment, Mr. Julian.
9:45 p.m.
NDP
9:45 p.m.
Liberal
John Cannis Liberal Scarborough Centre, ON
Mr. Chairman, you know, I've always been known to be a fair and transparent person. I think you could give Mr. Julian a slight opportunity, providing, of course, that he's accurate with his statements. I will agree to that. But the first moment I detect he's being inaccurate with his statements, then you cut it off. Is that fair?
For example, the previous statement he made was inaccurate--
9:45 p.m.
An hon. member
This won't take long.
9:45 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!