It's common that both parties will have some sensitivities. But you need to look at it not necessarily as trading off one to the other. This is a complex negotiation and it involves a lot of different issues. In agriculture alone, you're talking about a breadth of issues that is quite diversified.
You're not looking at it only from the same product on both sides and so on. You're trying to address each other's best export interests and sensitivities, and that's the process of a negotiation, trying to advance your interests across the board, whether there are more on the offensive side or more on the defensive side. I think in terms of these negotiations, Canada certainly has objectives in terms of enhancing our export interests in a number of areas: beef, pork, grains, processed products, so it's quite a breadth of different offensive interests.
The EU will also want to advance their interests across a range of products. It remains to be seen whether among their top interests there will be some interest pertaining to supply managed products. For now I think our position in the negotiations has been very clear, that on these products the government has stood firm in defending supply management. Therefore, maybe there are other areas where we can better accommodate their export interests and at the same time advance our own.