I'll try to respond to that. I think there are a number of different avenues we're going to be looking at when it comes to dispute settlement.
The main dispute settlement between states that will be in the agreement is the one I was referring to earlier. That will be a modification of the NAFTA and WTO approach that has been in place for so long, and an improvement over that. We will also have separate approaches, most likely in areas such as environment and labour, where there will be a different kind of process to be followed. We will have a different kind of process when it comes to investor-state disputes. Again, we'll be looking at modifying what has been used in the past under NAFTA chapter 11 and others.
Part of the issue you're asking about, particularly as it relates to government procurement, is also tied directly to the negotiating process. We're very much aware of the extent of the flexibilities the Europeans have in their government procurement system, and we're having a very detailed discussion in the negotiations about what those flexibilities are and what, if anything, they intend to do with them. If they do not intend to reduce some of those flexibilities, then we will incorporate those flexibilities into our own offer to the European Union. In other words, we're aiming for something that's going to be a level playing field.