What I would say to your question is that the U.S.-Jordan free trade agreement can be perhaps instructive as to how it worked in terms of those labour provisions under that treaty. My main point here would be that it was not the agreement per se that led to an improvement but it was international organizations like the AFL-CIO, which went public with violations several years after this agreement came into place, that then spurred some government action both by the United States diplomatically and by the Jordanian government.
Your previous question asked what the EU is doing. The EU has an association agreement with Jordan. I believe it came into place in 2002. It has a human rights clause in it. There is a six-month subcommittee on human rights meeting every six months in Brussels and Jordan. The EU is currently negotiating a free trade agreement with the Gulf Cooperation Council, as was mentioned earlier. It is also looking at the human rights clause there.
These are all, from our perspective, positive developments; however, we've also seen that countries have been rewarded with free trade agreements that then have human rights clauses in them, but they are not respected in practice. Sometimes they are awarded these free trade agreements despite recent declines in human rights protection. So it's not an automatic mechanism toward improving labour rights.