Yes, much as Glamis Gold previously used the NAFTA provisions to sue the U.S. government. Even though the company itself was based in Nevada, it had a Canadian affiliate and used that route to go after the U.S. So as I say, this has been going on for some time, and I don't see that it's going to stop.
The problem is I think not entirely with the agreements themselves, because the problem with the definition of what constitutes a Canadian corporation is a bit more complex. For better or worse, we're not looking at the Corporations Act. We're not looking at the securities commissions' requirements and the requirements for Canadian ownership, Canadian domicile, Canadian directorship of any of these companies. A company can be Canadian, have an office, a lawyer, a post office box, pay some taxes—preferably not too many—and be a Canadian corporate citizen.