The problem I'm trying to highlight with the existing agreement is that it does not provide the protection that should be in place to go along with the investment. Certainly increased investment could bring benefits, but only under conditions that are not evident in this case. That's my problem. I don't see the evidence. That's the other point I'm trying to make. It's a question of what you believe philosophically or ideologically, not what the evidence shows.
On November 29th, 2010. See this statement in context.