Could I just summarize? I also have a couple of questions for Mr. Clarke.
What you're saying is, even though this committee does have the right to change the implementing legislation—in fact, we've done that with two agreements, the last two agreements that were brought before the committee. Prior to the Jordan agreement, there were amendments made. So we have the right to do that. But if we rejected this agreement, what we would avoid, even though trade will continue, is making a bad situation worse, where you have an environmental override that any company can use by using these investor-state provisions. Do you think there's any link between this and the environmental assessment not being released?