— and I will try to explain that in 30 seconds. In all taxation principles for managing a country, there is one that I think is extremely important, and that is that there must always be a balance between voters, markets and the state. Obviously, we know that the markets have become more important than the state and perhaps even more important than the voters or the general public. We know that. It's okay and it's known because we believe in the virtue of the markets. However, we need to analyze all tax reductions for business. This doesn't mean just the rich and super-rich; this endangers this balance that we're trying to maintain between the state, the markets and the public.
Suppose that this is okay and that the fact that the multinationals sometimes become more powerful than the state itself has become a reality. Very slowly, because of discussions like the one we're having here, that focus on an agreement with a tax haven—and next year, it will be with another—we will in the end allow a global reduction in taxes for business. The situation will have to be analyzed in a context in which the relationship among markets, the state and voters will be thrown off balance. One day, we could very well find ourselves in a situation where the state has much more power than the two other levels. Furthermore, the markets would not pay tax, and the entire tax burden would be transferred to actual people.