Yes. Those principles are freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining. This is very good. This is weaker, as it's written down, than the Canada-Colombia agreement, which is interesting.
I just want to point out that we already have a rules-based system. The question now is what kinds of rules are being developed on top of rules that already exist. The first four obligations that are outlined in the labour side agreement refer to the 1998 Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Then the next three obligations refer to the decent work agenda.
What happens in the process of dispute resolution is that the parties must make a decision as to whether or not a complaint will go forward from any dispute that comes up, but what happens is that not all of those obligations would ever be brought to a review panel. Only the first four would. The ones that have to do with the decent work agenda would not be brought to a review panel.
The other thing is that in this labour provision, part 3 stipulates that the matter must be trade-related if it's to go to the next stage of a review panel, which raises the question of why investment is not there, when trade and investment were mentioned earlier on.
With a fuller discussion, we could talk about why we have objections to the labour side agreement--