I'm a little confused insofar as you've said twice in your opening comments, sir, that it was your understanding that we would conclude clause-by-clause today. I recall very specifically in prior meetings that this was exactly what we said we would do.
When I look at some of the clause-by-clause consideration, I seem to see a lot of pieces to this that have the NDP's initials in front of them. But it was clearly my understanding that if we were to show some consideration, I think, to various witnesses...forward, that we would be able to conclude clause-by-clause.
Do you have any sense or understanding that we will not conclude clause-by-clause today, sir?