Potentially there could be, yes. If you were to see statutory damages in the context of digital locks, then yes, the mere act of trying to circumvent, if we were to have those kinds of provisions, could lead to very significant penalties.
In the CETA context, though, I guess my view is that we're moving in a direction to provide some legal protection for digital locks. The Europeans want us to do the same, and what I think Canada ought to ensure is that we retain the same sort of flexibility that exists in international law for these legal protections for digital locks—to do so domestically. The Europeans are effectively saying “We want our approach to be the Canadian approach”; I'm saying we negotiated in the 1990s a consensus-driven model that provided flexibility in how you do that, and I think this agreement ought to retain that flexibility.