Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
Thanks to our witnesses. Those were all very good presentations.
Mr. Geist, I have a feeling you could have gone on for longer in giving some of the details around intellectual property. So I'd like to start off by giving the floor back to you.
Could you talk about the consequences of some of the components that you see in CETA around intellectual property? Examples would be substantial statutory damages for non-commercial infringement, what that means for the average Canadian user; and the digital lock provisions, the fact that, as you and other observers have mentioned, it's not a sound process around intellectual property. As well, if you have any knowledge around the C-directive, UPOV-91, you could add that to the mix. Certainly in terms of the issues you've mentioned, why is this important to ordinary Canadians?