In most bilateral agreements, at the start of the negotiations, the countries used to cite the sensitive products that they didn't want to put on the table. In the context of Europe, the objective was to aim for a 90% opening to the tariff lines, but without excluding any sensitive production or industry from the negotiations.
We're concerned because that's different from the bilateral negotiation mechanisms that have been used in the past. However, I believe that the proof of that will be in the negotiation itself. Currently, both the negotiators and the government are clearly telling us that they can defend management systems and ensure they stay protected within the negotiation mechanisms. However, as you say, no sectors were excluded from these negotiations at the outset. So we know they're all on the table. We also know that Europe has sensitive products and sensitive sectors. So there will be a balance at the end of the negotiations.