It's compensation for whatever losses the company bears by having that. For instance, if the company leaves that oil and gas find, and they no longer have it, they've suffered a loss. If you compensate the company for the loss that they've borne, as in the Abitibi case, then yes, the government can move on that, but you don't want to destabilize the rule of law or destabilize agreements that you've made. As I say, there are two separable questions here.
On March 10th, 2011. See this statement in context.