I think that the concept of expropriation is pretty simple. If somebody takes something from you—takes your investment, takes your house, takes something that you've built and invested in—the international law and, to a lesser extent, domestic law--although I'm not an expert in domestic law--provides for compensation. In this process, nobody took away the right of the Newfoundland government or of any of the provincial governments to manage natural resources.
I don't know the whole history of AbitibiBowater and what was going on. My simple assertion this morning was that from both sides of the counsel table--from the federal government lawyers who advised government and from the lawyers advising AbitibiBowater—it was a settlement worth making, because it was a lot less than the eventual claim could have been. The claim could have gone on for a long, long time. I think that in terms of people's concerns about the precedential value of the claim and the concerns about what this was going to lead to, having that case go on as a $500 million or $600 million case and having damages go on would have made it more difficult. The case was settled relatively quickly, and it was settled relatively quietly.