First of all, I'm an international trade lawyer and I've spent 25 to 30 years doing that. I left domestic practice when I left a firm in Sudbury, Ontario, where I was a litigator, so I can't speak to you with great expertise on the law of expropriation in Canada domestically.
I do believe it would be great for Canadian investors if they were able to use a chapter 11-like device to protect themselves against threats to their own investments here in Canada, but they can't, because that's not the way NAFTA is set up. I'm pretty certain that in most major developed countries--G-8 and G-7 countries--we're trying to attract large amounts of investment, and there's an international standard. It was set many years ago to protect countries like the United States and Canada in countries where there was a real danger that a massive investment could be taken away at the whim of a leader of some country, so those provisions are stronger.
We could get back to you with more, but in the domestic context there is a lot more discretion in the government in terms of how they address the expropriation exercise and how they compensate. I'm sorry that I don't know the details.