I guess you raise a good question. In our opinion, there really is no good reason. That's not to say that some particular vehicle models to satisfy a public procurement like this are not better than others in terms of the specifications of the public procurement requirements; the issue is about maintaining some content level to ensure that a reasonable portion of that procurement does circulate back into the Canadian economy. That strikes us as the most fundamental part of any public procurement, including in this case.
With the Canada Post procurement specifically, there are a lot of question marks around it. I can't answer some of your questions about it because I wasn't involved in the procurement. We were under the impression at the time that one of the Canadian models, the Windsor Town and Country model, was shortlisted as one of the vehicles satisfying the procurement project. That's been debated a bit publicly.
In this case, we would have much preferred the contract to come to Canada, although again, I don't want to speak too much more on it without knowing the specifics of the procurement itself.
I hope that satisfies the question.