Yes, thank you. I'll cut you off there, because I have more questions. Thank you.
For the environment side agreement and the labour side agreement, we are still waiting to hear from witnesses, although I'm sure we'll have a very fulsome series of witnesses for this committee. But some of the comments that have come back initially are that both are toothless.
If they're toothless, how would you react to that? What would you say, both for the environment agreement and the labour side agreement?
And who was consulted in Canada on both of those issues? You flagged some of the human rights and labour rights issues that exist, and certainly there are a broad number of reports available. But who has been consulted on those, and how would you defend them from the concerns among many people who know these businesses that they're toothless; that they're more designed for a cosmetic than for any real impact?