Good question, Bev.
As far as the low-level presence goes, you can look at it two ways. You can look at it very negatively and say this isn't a very good thing, but we can also have it so that you can enhance that and look at it as a competitive type of situation as well. We talked about the Codex thing here, about having more international standards to approve events that are out there. Situations of dust in shipments were alluded to, and more particularly a couple of years ago corn dust was found in a soybean shipment out of the U.S. and it was pretty hard on the market for a few months. We weren't sure where that was going to go.
If we can get these new events that are being developed genetically approved--and it's not that we're asking for a wide-open high level to be there--and if it can be accommodating for even a minuscule amount, then that can give us a competitive advantage too. I think that's been the success of the grains and oilseeds industry in Canada, particularly in soybeans and particularly in our own farm operation. The fact is, we can get down to that number that is put in place and we can do a good job because there are a lot of competitors around the world that can't. That's the one thing we have to make sure of: that we don't knock ourselves out of the market as well.
So when we do a low-level presence thing, we don't want the number too high. We just want to make sure those events are approved, that there is accommodation there, and that the low-level presence can be tolerated for a bit. We can work within those parameters. I see it as a benefit.