No, it does not mean the end of the industry. When we opened our wine industry to competition from the U.S. under NAFTA, everybody was predicting the end of the industry. It's flourishing in Ontario and B.C. It doesn't need to mean that at all. If we have competitive disadvantages of the kind Mr. Easter mentioned with respect to fuel, potash, climate, needing barns when others don't, let's address those more specifically but not protect against competition, especially when opening up to competition would mean that consumers and users would tend to be forgotten in these discussions. They would pay a significantly lower price, which for some people means a lot.
I see advertisements from the milk producers saying milk is such a healthy thing. It is. I love it. Why keep the price artificially high? That's my question. As has been mentioned, other countries are using other ways of supporting farms that seem to be more acceptable to their trading partners.