I do think you made a very important point, that there needs to be a stringent evaluation of the entire CETA. I think that is extremely important.
But I might mention to you—and I hope that you would be given the same opportunity—that we had the Canada Pork International before the committee. They see a lot of potential in the market. But they did say that they would be given the opportunity to sit down with the negotiator, and go line-by-line in terms of the areas that affect them. I would hope that you're given the same opportunity, because your organization has a wealth of experience in these trade agreements in terms of the impact they could have on sustainability and environment. So I'd just suggest to you that it may be a request you'd want to make.
Two areas.... You mentioned that the U.S.-Australia agreement is better. Could you tell us what that agreement is? I believe that was relating to the topic of expropriation, but I might be wrong.
And the other area.... Could you expand on the concept of national treatment? In one case you felt the EU position was better; and in the other, ours.
Could you expand on those two areas?